Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 0:54:27 GMT -5
A study has been made public that suggests a dark impact on the labor market due to the increase in the minimum wage . This increase would be destroying countless hypothetical employment contracts, because it would encourage the robotization of some jobs. As if this were not already being done to maximize profits after the mergers of large banking entities, whose office closures and staff readjustment reduce benefits to their clients, forced to process everything on their own in complex applications that do not have the most experienced or helpless. One could naively believe that, if workers earned more and had a salary that would allow them to meet their basic needs for the time being, they could dedicate part of their income to reactivating consumption. It does not seem likely that the machines will become customers of our small and medium-sized businesses, although they prefer to amortize contracts to clean up their accounting in the first instance. On the other hand, this increase does not allow percentage comparisons with other countries, where there are much higher minimum and average salaries. Not setting minimum wages that allow decent subsistence through.
The European social fabric is very disjointed, with the middle class having disappeared. Without it, a strained liberal democracy can hardly survive. It is striking that it costs so much to raise maximum income. It does not seem reasonable that certain families can accumulate exorbitant assets, because the resources that are hoarded will hardly be able to be enjoyed collectively, despite the Chinese Thailand Phone Number List philanthropic outbursts of certain incalculable fortunes. Once ordinary mortals are up to their eyeballs in debt, after exhausting all kinds of mortgage and personal loans, while banks whose assets were falsified would have to be rescued, wouldn't raising the remuneration of work stimulate consumption ? Nor should it be unreasonable to put limits on the increase in assets. Let's talk about two thousand euros in the first case and two hundred million in the second.
What figure would be an exaggeration? We are emerging from a pandemic whose consequences we do not know and we are entering a period of war whose scope we do not know. In this situation, acting as if nothing were happening would be considered ill-advised. We have to face an unprecedented migratory movement and in this case we intend to take care of the population that leaves its country. The European social fabric is very disjointed, with the middle class having disappeared. Without it, a liberal democracy strained by the excessive greed of hoarders and the desperation of those who have practically nothing to lose can hardly survive. I don't know how much the report on raising the minimum wage cost and what the world's objective is, work is equivalent to expanding pockets of poverty that represent a social time bomb. This frustration marginalizes increasingly numerous groups and is then used by ideologies that do not subscribe to the rules of the democratic game, given that in their opinion only the defenders of the elites can govern to maintain their privilege but it would be interesting if they gave us another one on a hypothetical setting of maximum incomes. To tell the tale, there are always at least a couple of addresses.
The European social fabric is very disjointed, with the middle class having disappeared. Without it, a strained liberal democracy can hardly survive. It is striking that it costs so much to raise maximum income. It does not seem reasonable that certain families can accumulate exorbitant assets, because the resources that are hoarded will hardly be able to be enjoyed collectively, despite the Chinese Thailand Phone Number List philanthropic outbursts of certain incalculable fortunes. Once ordinary mortals are up to their eyeballs in debt, after exhausting all kinds of mortgage and personal loans, while banks whose assets were falsified would have to be rescued, wouldn't raising the remuneration of work stimulate consumption ? Nor should it be unreasonable to put limits on the increase in assets. Let's talk about two thousand euros in the first case and two hundred million in the second.
What figure would be an exaggeration? We are emerging from a pandemic whose consequences we do not know and we are entering a period of war whose scope we do not know. In this situation, acting as if nothing were happening would be considered ill-advised. We have to face an unprecedented migratory movement and in this case we intend to take care of the population that leaves its country. The European social fabric is very disjointed, with the middle class having disappeared. Without it, a liberal democracy strained by the excessive greed of hoarders and the desperation of those who have practically nothing to lose can hardly survive. I don't know how much the report on raising the minimum wage cost and what the world's objective is, work is equivalent to expanding pockets of poverty that represent a social time bomb. This frustration marginalizes increasingly numerous groups and is then used by ideologies that do not subscribe to the rules of the democratic game, given that in their opinion only the defenders of the elites can govern to maintain their privilege but it would be interesting if they gave us another one on a hypothetical setting of maximum incomes. To tell the tale, there are always at least a couple of addresses.